Philippines vs Zambia: Use of IMF credit

Philippines
3.65 billion DOD, current US$
in 2024
Zambia
3.13 billion DOD, current US$
in 2024
Philippines rank
25th
Zambia rank
28th

Use of IMF credit over time

  • Philippines
  • Zambia
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B197019972024

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 3.65 billion DOD, current US$ against 3.13 billion DOD, current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 517.00 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 25th and Zambia ranks 28th of 122 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 303.95 million DOD, current US$ 128.54 million DOD, current US$ 175.42 million DOD, current US$ Philippines
1980s 1.11 billion DOD, current US$ 785.00 million DOD, current US$ 327.13 million DOD, current US$ Philippines
1990s 1.09 billion DOD, current US$ 1.03 billion DOD, current US$ 58.73 million DOD, current US$ Philippines
2000s 1.08 billion DOD, current US$ 766.82 million DOD, current US$ 317.45 million DOD, current US$ Philippines
2010s 1.22 billion DOD, current US$ 939.59 million DOD, current US$ 277.87 million DOD, current US$ Philippines
2020s 3.25 billion DOD, current US$ 2.06 billion DOD, current US$ 1.19 billion DOD, current US$ Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Philippines or Zambia?
Philippines, at 3.65 billion DOD, current US$ against 3.13 billion DOD, current US$ in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Philippines and Zambia?
517.00 million DOD, current US$, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zambia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Philippines and Zambia rank globally for use of imf credit?
Philippines ranks 25th and Zambia ranks 28th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Zambia: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/philippines/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/philippines/zambia/">Philippines vs Zambia: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
134 places, 6,029 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.