Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Timor-Leste: Use of IMF credit

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
50.86 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Timor-Leste
42.08 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
117th
Timor-Leste rank
119th

Use of IMF credit over time

  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Timor-Leste
020.0M40.0M60.0M198020022024

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 50.86 million DOD, current US$ against 42.08 million DOD, current US$ in Timor-Leste, a difference of 8.78 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.2 times Timor-Leste's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 117th and Timor-Leste ranks 119th of 123 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2010s 22.04 million DOD, current US$ 11.06 million DOD, current US$ 10.97 million DOD, current US$ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 48.87 million DOD, current US$ 36.92 million DOD, current US$ 11.95 million DOD, current US$ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Timor-Leste?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 50.86 million DOD, current US$ against 42.08 million DOD, current US$ in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Timor-Leste?
8.78 million DOD, current US$, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Timor-Leste?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Timor-Leste rank globally for use of imf credit?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 117th and Timor-Leste ranks 119th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Timor-Leste: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/timor-leste/">Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Timor-Leste: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
135 places, 6,055 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.