Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre was 1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 52.1%
Rank
6th
of 12 groups
All-time high
1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) is 1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.
The figure is up 52.1% on the previous year and up 56.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 19.91 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1972 | 24.28 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1973 | 29.97 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1974 | 33.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1975 | 37.98 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1976 | 45.89 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1977 | 56.95 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1978 | 67.51 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1979 | 75.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1980 | 93.07 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 1981 | 98.92 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1982 | 116.19 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1983 | 186.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +60.7% |
| 1984 | 161.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1985 | 187.78 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1986 | 258.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 1987 | 319.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 1988 | 364.07 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1989 | 351 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1990 | 419.91 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1991 | 505.58 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1992 | 499.2 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1993 | 569.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1994 | 554.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1995 | 533.79 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1996 | 525.69 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1997 | 522.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1998 | 500.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1999 | 661.25 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 2000 | 784.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 2001 | 594.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2002 | 716.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 2003 | 993.83 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +38.7% |
| 2004 | 772.39 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 2005 | 713.07 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2006 | 1,178 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +65.2% |
| 2007 | 743.94 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 2008 | 711.02 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2009 | 673.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2010 | 651.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2011 | 934.12 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +43.4% |
| 2012 | 599.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -35.8% |
| 2013 | 806.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2014 | 619.78 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2015 | 611.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2016 | 689.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2017 | 847.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2018 | 814.07 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2019 | 836.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2020 | 749.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2021 | 838.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2022 | 830.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2023 | 1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 40.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 75.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 213.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 93.07 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 364.07 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 529.27 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 419.91 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 661.25 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 788.03 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 594.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,178 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 741.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 599.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 934.12 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 920.36 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 749.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 3 Grenada 67,782 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Saint Kitts and Nevis 49,196 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Saint Lucia 44,237 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 El Salvador 37,331 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Jamaica 35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Mauritius 33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Dominica 19,560 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More external debt data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed 918.17 million NFL, US$ (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per capita 1.47 NFL, US$ per person (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per unit of GDP 0.0001 NFL, US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre 79.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre (2023)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 2.3% (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA 335.91 million NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita 0.5396 NFL, current US$ per person (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Net financial flows, IBRD 2.94 billion NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 8.6% (2024)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 1,263 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 6th out of 12 groups with data for 2023.
- Is multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Multilateral debt service International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.