Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square was 545.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
545.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 15.7%
Rank
9th
of 12 groups
All-time high
784.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
-227.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) recorded 545.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 15.7% on the previous year and up 109.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 784.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, -227.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, in 2006.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 28.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 30.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1972 | 34.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1973 | 39.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1974 | 53.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 1975 | 55.58 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1976 | 47.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1977 | 58.1 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1978 | 67.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1979 | 85.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1980 | 106.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 1981 | 121.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1982 | 171.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 1983 | 105.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 1984 | 180.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +70.5% |
| 1985 | 163.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1986 | 208.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 1987 | 112.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 1988 | 112.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1989 | 91.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1990 | 143.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1991 | 28.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -80.1% |
| 1992 | 9.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -67.7% |
| 1993 | 140.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +1428.6% |
| 1994 | -26.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -118.8% |
| 1995 | 169.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -740.5% |
| 1996 | 161.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1997 | 233.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 1998 | 554.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +137.4% |
| 1999 | 352.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 2000 | 173.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -50.8% |
| 2001 | 326.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +88.4% |
| 2002 | 84.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -74.2% |
| 2003 | 90.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2004 | -64.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -170.8% |
| 2005 | 10.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -117.0% |
| 2006 | -227.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -2185.4% |
| 2007 | 147.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -164.6% |
| 2008 | 256.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +74.0% |
| 2009 | 672.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +162.6% |
| 2010 | 784.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2011 | 26.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -96.6% |
| 2012 | 352.09 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +1212.6% |
| 2013 | 260.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2014 | 307.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2015 | 393.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2016 | 300.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 2017 | 132.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -56.0% |
| 2018 | 387.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +193.2% |
| 2019 | 320.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2020 | 782.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +143.8% |
| 2021 | 656.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2022 | 647.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2023 | 545.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 49.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 28.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 85.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 137.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 91.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 208.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 176.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -26.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 554.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 146.97 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -227.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 672.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 326.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 26.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 784.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 657.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 545.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 782.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 6 Dominica 49,397 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Ukraine 43,108 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Rwanda 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Bangladesh 28,484 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Sao Tome and Principe 26,670 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Dominican Republic 20,965 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Sri Lanka 18,736 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More external debt data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed 918.17 million NFL, US$ (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per capita 1.47 NFL, US$ per person (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per unit of GDP 0.0001 NFL, US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre 79.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre (2023)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 2.3% (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA 335.91 million NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita 0.5396 NFL, current US$ per person (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Net financial flows, IBRD 2.94 billion NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 8.6% (2024)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 545.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 784.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -227.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 9th out of 12 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 109.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net financial flows, multilateral International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.