Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, Debt instruments

Hong Kong, China
261.30 billion US dollar
in 2025
Switzerland
437.69 billion US dollar
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
7th
Switzerland rank
4th

Direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, Debt instruments over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Switzerland
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B198320042025

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 437.69 billion US dollar against 261.30 billion US dollar in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 176.39 billion US dollar.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.7 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 7th and Switzerland ranks 4th of 133 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Switzerland Difference Ahead
1990s 77.48 billion US dollar 30.81 billion US dollar 46.66 billion US dollar Hong Kong, China
2000s 99.69 billion US dollar 82.58 billion US dollar 17.11 billion US dollar Hong Kong, China
2010s 207.87 billion US dollar 291.70 billion US dollar 83.83 billion US dollar Switzerland
2020s 254.95 billion US dollar 406.47 billion US dollar 151.52 billion US dollar Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, debt instruments, Hong Kong, China or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 437.69 billion US dollar against 261.30 billion US dollar in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, debt instruments between Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
176.39 billion US dollar, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Switzerland rank globally for direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, debt instruments?
Hong Kong, China ranks 7th and Switzerland ranks 4th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, Debt instruments (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, Debt instruments. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investor-in-direct-invesment-enterprises-debt-instruments-assets-positions-us/hong-kong-sar-china/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investor-in-direct-invesment-enterprises-debt-instruments-assets-positions-us/hong-kong-sar-china/switzerland/">Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, Debt instruments</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Direct investor in direct invesment enterprises, Debt instruments (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
136 places, 2,668 data points, 1975–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.