Nepal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Nepal
144.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
165.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Nepal rank
81st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
78th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Nepal
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197619992023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 165.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 144.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 21.28 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 81st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 45.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 45.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 45.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 28.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 16.95 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 16.52 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 956.54 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 940.02 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 32.75 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 165.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 132.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Nepal or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 165.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 144.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2010.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Nepal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
21.28 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
27 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2010.
How do Nepal and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Nepal ranks 81st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Nepal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.