Pakistan vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Pakistan
2,413 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
2,248 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
25th
Rwanda rank
26th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • Rwanda
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 2,413 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,248 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 165 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Pakistan ranks 25th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 72.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 97.59 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 24.89 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 352.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 52.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 299.97 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 290.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 84.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 206.13 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 407.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 124.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 282.37 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 1,389 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 65.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,323 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 1,743 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,651 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 92.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Pakistan or Rwanda?
Pakistan, at 2,413 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,248 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Pakistan and Rwanda?
165 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
49 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 25th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/rwanda/">Pakistan vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.