Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: International investment position, Net (assets less liabilities)

Hong Kong, China
2.04 trillion
in 2024
Switzerland
1.15 trillion
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
4th
Switzerland rank
7th

International investment position, Net (assets less liabilities) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Switzerland
500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T200520142024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 2.04 trillion against 1.15 trillion in Switzerland, a difference of 896.11 billion.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.8 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Switzerland ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Switzerland ranks 7th of 171 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 567.23 billion 576.34 billion 9.11 billion Switzerland
2010s 1.02 trillion 669.30 billion 347.28 billion Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.96 trillion 928.43 billion 1.03 trillion Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international investment position, net (assets less liabilities), Hong Kong, China or Switzerland?
Hong Kong, China, at 2.04 trillion against 1.15 trillion in Switzerland as of 2024.
What is the difference in international investment position, net (assets less liabilities) between Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
896.11 billion, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Switzerland rank globally for international investment position, net (assets less liabilities)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Switzerland ranks 7th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as International investment position, Net (assets less liabilities), Adjusted using IMF accounting records (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: International investment position, Net (assets less liabilities). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-net-assets-less-liabilities-adjusted-using-imf/hong-kong-sar-china/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-net-assets-less-liabilities-adjusted-using-imf/hong-kong-sar-china/switzerland/">Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: International investment position, Net (assets less liabilities)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International investment position, Net (assets less liabilities), Adjusted using IMF accounting records (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
180 places, 3,172 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.