Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only
466.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
7th
IDA only rank
6th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • IDA only
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 466.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 10,398 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 23.3 times IDA only's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 7th and IDA only ranks 6th of 114 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh IDA only Difference Ahead
1970s 670.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 20.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 650.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 1,884 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 86.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,798 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 2,224 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 142.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,081 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 2,501 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 166.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,335 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 4,972 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 220.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,751 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 8,786 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 357.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 8,429 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or IDA only?
Bangladesh, at 10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 466.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and IDA only?
10,398 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and IDA only?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and IDA only rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 7th and IDA only ranks 6th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ida-only/">Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.