Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
21,978 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
7th
Rwanda rank
5th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Rwanda
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 21,978 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 11,114 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 2.0 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Rwanda ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 670.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 241.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 429.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 1,884 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 962.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 921.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 2,224 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,559 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 664.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 2,501 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,712 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 789.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 4,972 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 6,957 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,986 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 8,786 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 14,786 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 6,001 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 21,978 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
11,114 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/">Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.