Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
6,637 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
7th
Sri Lanka rank
8th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sri Lanka
05.0k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,637 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 4,227 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.6 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 7th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 114 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 670.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 143.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 527.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 1,884 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 933.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 950.6 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 2,224 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,510 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 713.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 2,501 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 927.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,574 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 4,972 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,324 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,648 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 8,786 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,049 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 6,737 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka?
Bangladesh, at 10,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,637 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
4,227 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sri-lanka/">Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.