Bhutan vs Europe & Central Asia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Bhutan
1,171 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia
28.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
26th
Europe & Central Asia rank
27th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Europe & Central Asia
05001.0k1.5k197019962023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 1,171 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 28.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 1,142 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 40.4 times Europe & Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 26th and Europe & Central Asia ranks 27th of 114 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Europe & Central Asia Difference Ahead
1980s 44.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -0.6812 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 45.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 25.1 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 8.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 16.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 209.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 16.09 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 193.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 470.2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 466.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 1,162 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 19.53 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,142 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Europe & Central Asia?
Bhutan, at 1,171 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 28.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Europe & Central Asia?
1,142 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Europe & Central Asia?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Europe & Central Asia rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 26th and Europe & Central Asia ranks 27th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Europe & Central Asia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/europe-and-central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/europe-and-central-asia/">Bhutan vs Europe & Central Asia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.