Bolivia vs Philippines: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Bolivia
-5.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
-8.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
81st
Philippines rank
83rd

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Philippines
-50050100150197019962023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports -5.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -8.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 2.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 81st and Philippines ranks 83rd of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 4.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 13.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 24.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 23.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 0.7672 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1990s 73.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 35.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 37.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 62.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -14.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 77.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 45.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -40.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 86.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s -1.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -31.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 30.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Philippines?
Bolivia, at -5.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -8.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Philippines?
2.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Philippines?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Philippines rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 81st and Philippines ranks 83rd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Philippines: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/philippines/">Bolivia vs Philippines: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.