Botswana vs Ecuador: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
-0.1588 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
-0.2657 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
71st
Ecuador rank
72nd

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
0102030197019962023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports -0.1588 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -0.2657 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1069 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 71st and Ecuador ranks 72nd of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 2.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 11.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s -0.3118 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -1.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s -0.755 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -3.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s -0.8417 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -4.53 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s -0.722 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -3.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s -0.3053 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -1.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 0.8866 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Ecuador?
Botswana, at -0.1588 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -0.2657 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Ecuador?
0.1069 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 71st and Ecuador ranks 72nd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.