Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Burundi
-179.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
-320.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
101st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
103rd

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019962023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports -179.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -320.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 140.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 101st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 103rd of 114 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 1,676 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,350 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,674 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1,035 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,623 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,588 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 779.94 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,222 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,442 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 46.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -145.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 192.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s -153.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -312.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 158.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Burundi or Sao Tome and Principe?
Burundi, at -179.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -320.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
140.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 101st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 103rd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/sao-tome-and-principe/">Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.