Cape Verde vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Cape Verde
12,385 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
432.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
8th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 12,385 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 432.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 11,953 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 28.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 114 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 352.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 60.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 292.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 2,038 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 102.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,935 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 4,083 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 120.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,963 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 2,947 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 205.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,741 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 13,131 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 364.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 12,767 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Cape Verde, at 12,385 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 432.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Sub-Saharan Africa?
11,953 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sub-Saharan Africa?
41 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/sub-saharan-africa/">Cape Verde vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.