Cameroon vs IBRD only: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Cameroon
370.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
-40.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
38th
IBRD only rank
37th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • IBRD only
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 370.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -40.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 410.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 9.1 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 38th and IBRD only ranks 37th of 114 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon IBRD only Difference Ahead
1970s 25.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9.2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 15.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 22.97 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 22.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 0.5139 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 110.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 26.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 83.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 77.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 20.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 56.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 274.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -3.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 278.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 351.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -25.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 377.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Cameroon or IBRD only?
Cameroon, at 370.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -40.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Cameroon and IBRD only?
410.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and IBRD only?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and IBRD only rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 38th and IBRD only ranks 37th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs IBRD only: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/ibrd-only/">Cameroon vs IBRD only: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.