Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Colombia
-0.3182 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
Zimbabwe
-0.6411 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
75th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300197119972023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports -0.3182 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -0.6411 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3229 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Colombia ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 114 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s -0.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 17.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 18.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s -0.6363 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 113.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 113.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s -0.6363 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s -0.4772 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 0.4772 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Colombia, at -0.3182 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -0.6411 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
0.3229 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
28 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2011.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.