Congo vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Congo
179.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
215.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
46th
Nicaragua rank
44th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Nicaragua
02505007501.0k197219972023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 215.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 179.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 46th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 114 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 7.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 20.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 12.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 20.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 49.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 28.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 31.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 490.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 459.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 33.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 606.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 573.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 37.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 282.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 245.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 199.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 493.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 294.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 215.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 179.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Nicaragua?
35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nicaragua?
47 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Congo and Nicaragua rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 46th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/nicaragua/">Congo vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.