Djibouti vs IDA & IBRD total: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Djibouti
1,797 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total
129.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
20th
IDA & IBRD total rank
21st

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Djibouti
  • IDA & IBRD total
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 1,797 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 129.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 1,668 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 13.9 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1983 it was IDA & IBRD total ahead.

Djibouti ranks 20th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 21st of 114 countries.

Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
1980s 148.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 43.13 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 105.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
1990s 94.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 55.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 39.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
2000s 396.13 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 56.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 339.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
2010s 89.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 66.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 23.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
2020s 1,286 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 113.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,173 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Djibouti or IDA & IBRD total?
Djibouti, at 1,797 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 129.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Djibouti and IDA & IBRD total?
1,668 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and IDA & IBRD total?
41 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Djibouti ranks 20th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 21st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs IDA & IBRD total: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Djibouti vs IDA & IBRD total: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.