Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Ecuador
-0.2657 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-0.6411 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
72nd
Zimbabwe rank
75th
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -0.2657 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -0.6411 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3754 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ecuador ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 114 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -1.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 17.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 19.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | -4.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 113.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 117.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | -4.53 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 5.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | -3.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8123 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 2.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | -1.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0854 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Ecuador, at -0.2657 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -0.6411 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3754 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.