Gambia vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Gambia
163.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
215.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
47th
Nicaragua rank
44th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Gambia
  • Nicaragua
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197219972023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 215.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 163.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 51.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 47th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 130.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 20.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 110.53 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 576.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 49.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 527.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 849.94 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 452.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 397.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 788.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 606.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 182.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 610.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 282.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 327.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 373.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 493.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 119.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Gambia or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 215.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 163.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Gambia and Nicaragua?
51.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Nicaragua?
48 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Nicaragua rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 47th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/nicaragua/">Gambia vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.