IBRD only vs Jordan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

IBRD only
-40.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
299.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
37th
Jordan rank
40th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IBRD only
  • Jordan
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 299.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -40.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 340.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 7.4 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jordan ahead.

IBRD only ranks 37th and Jordan ranks 40th of 37 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 9.2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 64.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 55.09 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 22.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 13.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
1990s 26.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -20.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 47.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
2000s 20.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -28.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 49.58 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
2010s -3.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 74.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 78.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s -25.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 244.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 270.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, IBRD only or Jordan?
Jordan, at 299.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -40.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between IBRD only and Jordan?
340.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Jordan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Jordan rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 37th and Jordan ranks 40th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Jordan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/jordan/">IBRD only vs Jordan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.