Low income vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Low income
183.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
1,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
15th
Pakistan rank
18th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Low income
  • Pakistan
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 183.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 1,775 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 10.7 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Low income ranks 15th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 37 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 10.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 66.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 56.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 55.53 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 137.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 82.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 78.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 255.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 177.97 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 97.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 682.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 585.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 86.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 689.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 603.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 130.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,344 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,213 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Low income or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 1,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 183.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Low income and Pakistan?
1,775 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Low income and Pakistan rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Low income ranks 15th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/pakistan/">Low income vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.