Malawi vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Malawi
2,317 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
1,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
15th
Pakistan rank
18th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Pakistan
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k197019962023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2,317 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 359 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 15th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 111.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 66.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 44.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 491.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 137.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 353.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 1,018 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 255.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 761.6 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 469.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 682.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 213.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 880.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 689.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 190.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 1,639 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,344 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 295.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Malawi or Pakistan?
Malawi, at 2,317 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Malawi and Pakistan?
359 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Pakistan rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 15th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/pakistan/">Malawi vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.