Mauritania vs Niger: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritania
34.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
72.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
54th
Niger rank
52nd

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Niger
0100200300400197019962023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 72.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 34.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 37.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Niger's figure about 2.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Niger ahead.

Mauritania ranks 54th and Niger ranks 52nd of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Niger Difference Ahead
1970s 2.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 0.7068 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Niger
1980s 11.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 25.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 13.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Niger
1990s 24.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 24.1 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 0.6525 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 43.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 40.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3.6 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 14.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 86.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 71.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Niger
2020s 11.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 226.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 214.47 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Niger?
Niger, at 72.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 34.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Niger?
37.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Niger?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Niger rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 54th and Niger ranks 52nd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Niger: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/niger/">Mauritania vs Niger: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.