Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Rwanda
21,978 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
6,637 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
5th
Sri Lanka rank
8th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 21,978 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,637 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 15,341 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 3.3 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Rwanda ranks 5th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 114 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 194.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 122.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 71.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 962.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 933.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 28.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 1,559 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,510 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 49.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 1,712 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 927.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 784.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 6,957 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,324 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5,634 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 14,786 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,049 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 12,737 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at 21,978 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,637 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
15,341 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 5th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.