South Asia vs Uganda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

South Asia
68.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
870.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia rank
24th
Uganda rank
27th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • South Asia
  • Uganda
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 870.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 68.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia, a difference of 802.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 12.8 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Asia ahead.

South Asia ranks 24th and Uganda ranks 27th of 37 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, South Asia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 124.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 16.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 108.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
1980s 334.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 285.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 48.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
1990s 328.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 773.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 444.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 254.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,054 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 799.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 237.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,184 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 946.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 187.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,715 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,528 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, South Asia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 870.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 68.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between South Asia and Uganda?
802.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do South Asia and Uganda rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
South Asia ranks 24th and Uganda ranks 27th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia vs Uganda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-asia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-asia/uganda/">South Asia vs Uganda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.