Sub-Saharan Africa vs Togo: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre

Sub-Saharan Africa
432.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
3,570 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
8th
Togo rank
11th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Togo
-2.0k02.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 3,570 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 432.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 3,138 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 8.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Togo ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th and Togo ranks 11th of 37 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Togo Difference Ahead
1970s 9.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 53.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 44.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Togo
1980s 50.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 518.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 468.09 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Togo
1990s 102.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 507.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 404.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Togo
2000s 120.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -221.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 342.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 212.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 298.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 85.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Togo
2020s 364.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,500 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Sub-Saharan Africa or Togo?
Togo, at 3,570 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 432.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Sub-Saharan Africa and Togo?
3,138 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Togo?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Togo rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th and Togo ranks 11th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Togo: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/togo/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Togo: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 6,729 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.