Bolivia vs Zambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) … square

Bolivia
258.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
78th
Zambia rank
79th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) … square over time

  • Bolivia
  • Zambia
02505007501.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 258.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 3.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 78th and Zambia ranks 79th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 33.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 39.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 6.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 93.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 85.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 8.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1990s 135.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 150.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 14.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 170.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 146.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 24.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 517.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 213.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 303.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 457.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 650.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 192.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Bolivia or Zambia?
Bolivia, at 258.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Bolivia and Zambia?
3.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Zambia rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Bolivia ranks 78th and Zambia ranks 79th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Zambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zambia/">Bolivia vs Zambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.