Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Zambia
Zambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square was 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 76.9%
World rank
79th
of 121 countries
All-time high
1,099 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
1.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Zambia, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Zambia recorded 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 76.9% on the previous year and up 28.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Zambia peaked at 1,099 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 1.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Zambia ranks 79th of 121 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Zambia, year by year
| Year | NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 1.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 4.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +133.5% |
| 1972 | 12.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +183.3% |
| 1973 | 27.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +119.0% |
| 1974 | 59.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +119.9% |
| 1975 | 78.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1976 | 94.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1977 | 59.13 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -37.2% |
| 1978 | 39.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1979 | 21.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 1980 | 50.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +141.4% |
| 1981 | 67.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 1982 | 37.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -43.8% |
| 1983 | 23.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 1984 | 90.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +287.0% |
| 1985 | 188.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +107.5% |
| 1986 | 174.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1987 | 93.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 1988 | 85.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1989 | 39.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -53.9% |
| 1990 | 92.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +134.3% |
| 1991 | 101.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1992 | 188.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +85.6% |
| 1993 | 190.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 189.94 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1995 | 175.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1996 | 167.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1997 | 180.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1998 | 8.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -95.4% |
| 1999 | 212.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +2444.1% |
| 2000 | 268 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2001 | 168.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 2002 | 221.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 2003 | 132.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -40.3% |
| 2004 | 217.13 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +64.1% |
| 2005 | 118.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -45.4% |
| 2006 | 111.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2007 | 65.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2008 | 99.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 2009 | 60.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -39.2% |
| 2010 | 100.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +65.3% |
| 2011 | 73.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 2012 | 155.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +112.2% |
| 2013 | 198.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 2014 | 212.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2015 | 218.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2016 | 192.58 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2017 | 184.47 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2018 | 304.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +65.1% |
| 2019 | 496.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +63.1% |
| 2020 | 1,025 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +106.4% |
| 2021 | 221.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -78.4% |
| 2022 | 1,099 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +396.6% |
| 2023 | 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -76.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 39.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 94.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 85.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 23.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 188.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 150.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 8.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 212.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 146.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 60.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 268 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 213.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 73.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 496.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 650.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 221.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,099 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 76 Lao People's Democratic Republic 340.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 77 Turkmenistan 267.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 78 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 258.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 80 Honduras 217.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 81 Albania 217.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 82 Mali 178.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More external debt data for Zambia
- IFC, private nonguaranteed -21.36 million NFL, US$ (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per capita -1 NFL, US$ per person (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per unit of GDP -0.0008 NFL, US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre 5.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre (2023)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 3.0% (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA 334.58 million NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita 15.7 NFL, current US$ per person (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Net financial flows, IBRD -3.28 million NFL, current US$ (2004)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 5.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Zambia?
- Net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Zambia was 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 1,099 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Zambia rank for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
- Zambia ranks 79th out of 121 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 28.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net financial flows, multilateral International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.