Honduras vs Zambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Honduras
217.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
80th
Zambia rank
79th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Honduras
  • Zambia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 217.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 36.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 80th and Zambia ranks 79th of 121 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 355.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 39.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 315.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Honduras
1980s 691.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 85.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 606.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 958.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 150.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 807.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Honduras
2000s 1,031 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 146.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 885.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Honduras
2010s 2,834 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 213.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,620 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Honduras
2020s 3,492 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 650.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,842 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Honduras or Zambia?
Zambia, at 254.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 217.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Honduras and Zambia?
36.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Zambia rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Honduras ranks 80th and Zambia ranks 79th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Zambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/zambia/">Honduras vs Zambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.