Burkina Faso vs Morocco: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Burkina Faso
1,094 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
1,227 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
55th
Morocco rank
53rd

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Morocco
-2.0k02.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 1,227 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,094 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 133 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Morocco ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 55th and Morocco ranks 53rd of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Morocco Difference Ahead
1970s 41.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 134.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 92.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 129.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 579.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 450.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 254.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 628.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 373.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 551.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 546.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 654.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,065 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,410 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 1,296 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,443 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,147 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Burkina Faso or Morocco?
Morocco, at 1,227 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,094 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Burkina Faso and Morocco?
133 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Morocco?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Morocco rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Burkina Faso ranks 55th and Morocco ranks 53rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Morocco: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/morocco/">Burkina Faso vs Morocco: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.