Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time
- Burkina Faso
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 1,094 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 969.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 124.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 121 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 41.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -9.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 51.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 129.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 119.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 254.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 235.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 18.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 551.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -5.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 556.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 654.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2173 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 654.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 1,296 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 237.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,059 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
- Burkina Faso, at 1,094 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 969.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 124.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
- Burkina Faso ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.