Ecuador vs Gambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Ecuador
5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
6,131 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
24th
Gambia rank
23rd

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Gambia
-2.5k02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 6,131 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 468 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Gambia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 24th and Gambia ranks 23rd of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 119.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 277.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 157.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 551.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,420 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 868.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 575.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,647 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,072 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 263.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,418 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,154 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 2,735 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,273 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 461.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 6,990 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,712 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,278 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Ecuador or Gambia?
Gambia, at 6,131 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Ecuador and Gambia?
468 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Gambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Gambia rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 24th and Gambia ranks 23rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Gambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/gambia-the/">Ecuador vs Gambia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.