Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square was 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 22.0%
World rank
24th
of 121 countries
All-time high
8,754 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
-1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Ecuador, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Ecuador is 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 22.0% on the previous year and up 522.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Ecuador peaked at 8,754 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, -1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, in 2008.
That places Ecuador 24th out of 121 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 25.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 25.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1972 | 43.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +70.7% |
| 1973 | 43.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1974 | 96.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +120.7% |
| 1975 | 160.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +66.5% |
| 1976 | 165.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1977 | 124.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 1978 | 115.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1979 | 208.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +80.2% |
| 1980 | 270.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 1981 | 363.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 1982 | 346.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1983 | 199.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -42.5% |
| 1984 | 379.66 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +90.5% |
| 1985 | 390.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 1,776 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +355.0% |
| 1987 | 916.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -48.4% |
| 1988 | 642.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 1989 | 232.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -63.8% |
| 1990 | 215.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1991 | 293.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1992 | 212.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 1993 | 294.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 1994 | 382.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 1995 | 1,278 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +234.3% |
| 1996 | 1,098 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1997 | 231.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -78.9% |
| 1998 | 952.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +311.3% |
| 1999 | 793.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2000 | 512.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -35.4% |
| 2001 | 455.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2002 | -610.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -233.9% |
| 2003 | 628.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -203.0% |
| 2004 | -602.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -195.9% |
| 2005 | -376.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2006 | 1,443 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -482.9% |
| 2007 | 2,565 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +77.7% |
| 2008 | -1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -162.2% |
| 2009 | 216.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -113.5% |
| 2010 | 3,311 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +1431.4% |
| 2011 | 274.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -91.7% |
| 2012 | 360.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 2013 | 909.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +152.3% |
| 2014 | 1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +75.4% |
| 2015 | 6,509 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +307.8% |
| 2016 | 2,613 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -59.8% |
| 2017 | 2,090 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2018 | 4,757 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +127.6% |
| 2019 | 4,929 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2020 | 8,754 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +77.6% |
| 2021 | 6,285 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 2022 | 7,258 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2023 | 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -22.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 101.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 25.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 208.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 551.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 199.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,776 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 575.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 212.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,278 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 263.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 2,565 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,735 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 274.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 6,509 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6,990 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 8,754 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 21 Senegal 7,696 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Georgia 6,441 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Gambia 6,131 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Republic of Moldova 5,366 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Uzbekistan 5,188 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Côte d'Ivoire 4,487 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More external debt data for Ecuador
- IFC, private nonguaranteed 96.60 million NFL, US$ (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per capita 5.33 NFL, US$ per person (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per unit of GDP 0.0008 NFL, US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre 77.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre (2023)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 3.7% (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA -66,000 NFL, current US$ (2023)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita -0.0037 NFL, current US$ per person (2023)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP -0 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Net financial flows, IBRD 1.05 billion NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 11.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Ecuador?
- Net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square in Ecuador was 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 8,754 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- How does Ecuador rank for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
- Ecuador ranks 24th out of 121 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 522.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net financial flows, multilateral International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.