Ecuador vs Senegal: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Ecuador
5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
7,696 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
24th
Senegal rank
21st

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Senegal
-2.5k02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 7,696 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 2,033 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 24th and Senegal ranks 21st of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Senegal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Senegal Difference Ahead
1970s 101.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 84.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 16.47 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 551.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 483.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 67.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 575.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 400.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 174.94 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 263.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 928.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 665.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2010s 2,735 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,106 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 629.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 6,990 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5,229 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,761 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Ecuador or Senegal?
Senegal, at 7,696 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Ecuador and Senegal?
2,033 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Senegal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Senegal rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 24th and Senegal ranks 21st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Senegal: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/senegal/">Ecuador vs Senegal: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.