Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Percent of
Czechia
-3.81
in 2030
Equatorial Guinea
-3.64
in 2030
Czechia rank
154th
Equatorial Guinea rank
151st
Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Percent of over time
- Czechia
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -3.64 against -3.81 in Czechia, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 154th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 195 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.33 | -2.75 | 0.5868 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | -3.83 | 11.47 | 15.3 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -1.15 | -4.91 | 3.76 | Czechia |
| 2020s | -3.33 | 0.0535 | 3.39 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2030s | -3.81 | -3.64 | 0.1726 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), general government, percent of, Czechia or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -3.64 against -3.81 in Czechia as of 2030.
- What is the difference in net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), general government, percent of between Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.17, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2030.
- How do Czechia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), general government, percent of?
- Czechia ranks 154th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fiscal Monitor (FM) 2025 October