Nepal vs North Macedonia: Other investment, Debt instruments
Other investment, Debt instruments over time
- Nepal
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 2.49 billion US dollar against 2.36 billion US dollar in Nepal, a difference of 129.04 million US dollar.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Nepal ranks 121st and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 173 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.14 billion US dollar | 1.82 billion US dollar | 678.23 million US dollar | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 1.65 billion US dollar | 2.11 billion US dollar | 461.96 million US dollar | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other investment, debt instruments, Nepal or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 2.49 billion US dollar against 2.36 billion US dollar in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in other investment, debt instruments between Nepal and North Macedonia?
- 129.04 million US dollar, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and North Macedonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and North Macedonia rank globally for other investment, debt instruments?
- Nepal ranks 121st and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Debt instruments (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.