Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in South Korea
South Korea: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre was 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2015. ◆ Volatile
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in South Korea, 1970–2015
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2015, net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in South Korea stood at 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in South Korea peaked at 207.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 1974 and was at its lowest, -380.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, in 2009.
South Korea ranks 58th of 114 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in South Korea, year by year
| Year | NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 11.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 156.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +1272.7% |
| 1972 | 39.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -74.8% |
| 1973 | 62.2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +57.9% |
| 1974 | 207.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +233.3% |
| 1975 | 147.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 1976 | 103.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 1977 | 93.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1978 | 32.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -65.6% |
| 1979 | -4.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -112.9% |
| 1980 | -6.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1981 | -7.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1982 | -9.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1983 | -15.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1984 | -15.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -15.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1986 | -15.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -17.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1988 | -17.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1989 | -21.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1990 | -25.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1991 | -26.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1992 | -30.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1993 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1994 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -35.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2002 | -35.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2003 | -35.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -35.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -35.81 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -35.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -35.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -35.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2009 | -380.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +963.0% |
| 2010 | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2011 | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2012 | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2013 | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2014 | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2015 | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
South Korea compared with similar countries
- South Korea's 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -4.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre. (16 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in South Korea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1971 | +1272.7% | 11.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 156.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2009 | -963.0% | -35.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -380.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1974 | +233.3% | 62.2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 207.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1979 | -112.9% | 32.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2010 | +100.0% | -380.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1972 | -74.8% | 156.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 39.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 84.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 207.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | -14.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -21.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -6.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | -33.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -35.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -25.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -70.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -380.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -35.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
Countries ranked near South Korea
- 55 Tajikistan 24.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 56 Mongolia 6.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 57 Mozambique 2.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Chile 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Czechia 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Eritrea 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Estonia 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Greece 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Croatia 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Oman 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Poland 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Slovakia 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Slovenia 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
- 58 Syria 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Trinidad and Tobago 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
More external debt data for South Korea
- Net financial flows, IDA 0 NFL, current US$ (2015)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita 0 NFL, current US$ per person (2015)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP 0 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2015)
- Net financial flows, IBRD 0 NFL, current US$ (2016)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), annual growth rate 100 % change on previous year (2010)
- Net financial flows, IBRD (NFL, current US$), annual growth rate 100 % change on previous year (2014)
- Other investment, Debt instruments 309.08 billion US dollar (2025)
- Other investment, Debt instruments (Assets, Positions, US dollar) 7.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations 188.50 billion US dollar (2025)
- Other investment, Debt instruments (Assets, Positions, US dollar) 5,980 US dollar per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in South Korea?
- Net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in South Korea was 0 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2015, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in South Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 207.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 1974.
- What is the lowest net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in South Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was -380.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- How does South Korea rank for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
- South Korea ranks 58th out of 114 countries with data for 2015.
- Is net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in South Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Korea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net financial flows, IDA International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.