Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries): Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre was 10.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
10.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 107.2%
Rank
28th
of 37 groups
All-time high
24.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
All-time low
0.427 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 10.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 107.2% on the previous year and up 5.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 24.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.427 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 28th of 37 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.427 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.4507 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1972 | 0.8888 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +97.2% |
| 1973 | 0.7439 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1974 | 1.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 1975 | 1.65 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1976 | 1.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1977 | 1.97 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1978 | 1.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1979 | 1.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1980 | 2.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +98.2% |
| 1981 | 3.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1982 | 1.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -58.2% |
| 1983 | 1.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1984 | 1.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1985 | 1.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -36.9% |
| 1986 | 1.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 1987 | 4.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +180.3% |
| 1988 | 6.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +47.8% |
| 1989 | 4.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 1990 | 5.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 1991 | 9.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +76.0% |
| 1992 | 9.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1993 | 7.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1994 | 9.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 1995 | 12.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1996 | 14.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1997 | 16.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1998 | 14.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 1999 | 24.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +66.1% |
| 2000 | 9.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -61.9% |
| 2001 | 13.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +41.8% |
| 2002 | 11.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2003 | 15.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2004 | 16.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2005 | 13.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2006 | 7.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 2007 | 5.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 2008 | 4.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2009 | 6.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +50.9% |
| 2010 | 8.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2011 | 10.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 2012 | 7.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 2013 | 9.66 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 2014 | 8.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2015 | 14.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +68.1% |
| 2016 | 4.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 2017 | 3.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2018 | 5.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +54.8% |
| 2019 | 6.1 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2020 | 14.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +141.9% |
| 2021 | 14.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 4.94 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -66.8% |
| 2023 | 10.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +107.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 0.427 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1.97 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 6.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 5.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 24.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 4.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 16.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 3.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 14.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 11.2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 4.94 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 14.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 25 Nepal 1,245 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Bhutan 1,171 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Uganda 870.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Guinea-Bissau 869.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Lesotho 868.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Solomon Islands 730.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Burkina Faso 641.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More external debt data for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed 918.17 million NFL, US$ (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per capita 1.42 NFL, US$ per person (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per unit of GDP 0.0001 NFL, US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre 74.56 NFL, US$ per square kilometre (2023)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 2.3% (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA 355.03 million NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita 0.5487 NFL, current US$ per person (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Net financial flows, IBRD 2.94 billion NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 8.6% (2024)
All data for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) was 10.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 24.28 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.427 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 28th out of 37 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net financial flows, IDA International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.