Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Tanzania: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 1,898 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 134.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 1,763 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 14.1 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania ahead.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 20th and Tanzania ranks 19th of 37 groups.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 12.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 19.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 7.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
| 1980s | -3.6 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 85.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 89.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 39.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 178.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 139.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 75.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 365.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 290.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 15.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 607.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 591.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 90.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,104 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,013 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 1,898 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 134.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Tanzania?
- 1,763 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Tanzania?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Tanzania rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 20th and Tanzania ranks 19th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.