Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre was 134.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
134.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 30.9%
Rank
20th
of 37 groups
All-time high
194.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
-35.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) is 134.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 30.9% on the previous year and up 1,198.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 194.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, -35.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, in 2019.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 20th of 37 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 9.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 6.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -32.0% |
| 1972 | 4.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 1973 | 3.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1974 | 16.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +342.8% |
| 1975 | 20.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1976 | 24.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1977 | 22.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1978 | 9.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -58.0% |
| 1979 | 2.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -75.4% |
| 1980 | -1.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -147.3% |
| 1981 | -1.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1982 | -2.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 1983 | -3.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 1984 | -3.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1985 | -4.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 1986 | -4.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1987 | -4.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1988 | -4.66 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1989 | -5.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1990 | -5.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1991 | -5.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1992 | -0.5529 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -90.0% |
| 1993 | 7.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -1434.4% |
| 1994 | 19.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +160.4% |
| 1995 | 62.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +227.1% |
| 1996 | 81.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1997 | 73.66 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1998 | 76.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1999 | 84.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2000 | 59.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2001 | 56.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2002 | 102.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +83.0% |
| 2003 | 82.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 2004 | 122.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +49.0% |
| 2005 | 67.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 2006 | 63.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2007 | 69.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2008 | 58.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 2009 | 70.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 2010 | 56.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 2011 | 44.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2012 | 48.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2013 | -12.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -125.4% |
| 2014 | 11.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -197.2% |
| 2015 | -1.63 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -113.7% |
| 2016 | -5.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +257.6% |
| 2017 | -18.58 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +219.0% |
| 2018 | 65.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -454.8% |
| 2019 | -35.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -153.5% |
| 2020 | 26.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -174.0% |
| 2021 | 7.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -72.6% |
| 2022 | 194.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | +2629.4% |
| 2023 | 134.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -30.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 12.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 2.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 24.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | -3.6 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -5.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 39.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -5.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 84.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 75.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 56.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 122.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | -35.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 65.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 90.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 7.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 194.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 17 Cambodia 2,070 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Pakistan 1,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Tanzania, United Republic of 1,898 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Djibouti 1,797 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Nigeria 1,640 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Uzbekistan 1,458 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Kenya 1,386 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More external debt data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed 843.50 million NFL, US$ (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per capita 3.37 NFL, US$ per person (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per unit of GDP 0.0003 NFL, US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre 170.41 NFL, US$ per square kilometre (2023)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 2.5% (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA 5.20 billion NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita 20.79 NFL, current US$ per person (2024)
- Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0021 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Net financial flows, IBRD 5.92 billion NFL, current US$ (2024)
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service 7.2% (2024)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 134.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 194.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -35.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 20th out of 37 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,198.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net financial flows, IDA International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.